Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denver Rocky Mountain News

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedily deleted and recreated as a redirect. FCYTravis 19:42, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

Denver Rocky Mountain News
Personal essay --Ryan Delaney talk 11:01, 17 August 2005 (UTC)


 * And borderline nonsense. Delete Tonywalton 11:21, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete for the reasons above. Sliggy 11:52, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete personal essay (although I see what the guy's saying), has no place here. Alf 15:00, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * WTF? Keep Redirect as per Sliggy. DRMN is a real newspaper. If you don't like the content, change it! VfD is not the place to complain about article quality. Sdedeo 15:25, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * You are, of course, right. I started to see if I could rustle up an article, but found that Rocky Mountain News already exists so redirected to that. (keep) Sliggy 16:40, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Just noticed my actions above are a breach of etiquette; this article reverted to previous content. 3rd time lucky: redirect to Rocky Mountain News. Sliggy 17:01, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * keep, newspaper, article needs work. BillyCreamCorn 16:13, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Rocky Mountain News. Nothing to merge. --Icelight 18:14, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete attempt to correspond with the newspaper, and create redirect. Gazpacho 19:47, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Redirect per Icelight. Speedy Delete.  After thinking about my vote I realized that the article is gibberish.  I think it meets criteria G1, A1 and A4 in CSD.  Leaving a redirect does make sense.  Vegaswikian 06:44, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Meets CSD criterion. Usrnme h8er 14:40, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * Speedy Redirect per Icelight. Speedy Delete.  After thinking about my vote I realized that the article is gibberish.  I think it meets criteria G1, A1 and A4 in CSD.  Leaving a redirect does make sense.  Vegaswikian 06:44, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Meets CSD criterion. Usrnme h8er 14:40, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.