Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denyse Berend


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete per consensus. Keeper  |   76   |   Disclaimer  21:40, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Denyse Berend

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Interesting story, but it seems to be a WP:BLP1E case. She only got a brief flurry of news for her buying a Persian artifact, and seems to have gone back to being a "normal" person. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:38, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Delete Barely even gets to WP:BLP1E significance, since the article/buzz is essentially about the artifact, not the individual. Could possibly be reconstructed by the original editor as an article about the case, or the artifact, but it certainly does not warrant a biography entry. Debate (talk) 05:28, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Illicit antiquities, which already links to it. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:57, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge with an article with a more suitable title. The woman got huge media attention in Iran for a long period of time and the highest authorities in the government got involved in the case. That is enough to make her (or the case) notable. There are numerous cases in wikipedia like this: cases that got significant media attention and result in international crisis appear in wikipedia. Examples are the recent case about Dutch man who abused her daughter for several decades. The article also refers to the double standard of British court: putting French law at a higher status than the Iranian law. Sangak  Talk 08:12, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. A blatant case of WP:BLP1E.  KleenupKrew (talk) 11:11, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. 69.140.152.55 (talk) 02:51, 15 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.