Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denzil Remedios


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  01:31, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Denzil Remedios

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:BLP of a songwriter and record producer, not reliably sourced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. As always, songwriters and record producers are not automatically deemed "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG on reliable source coverage about them to establish that their work has been externally validated as significant (e.g. notable music awards, critical analysis of their work, etc.) -- but the only notability claim on offer here is that he and his credits exist, and the footnotes consist of a deadlinked primary source "staff" profile on the self-published website of his own publishing company, a Q&A interview in which he's answering questions about himself in the first person on an unreliable blog, and a glancing namecheck of his existence in a news article about somebody else -- which means two of the three footnotes aren't support for notability at all, and the third one isn't substantively enough about him to get him over GNG all by itself. Bearcat (talk) 14:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  18:06, 16 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:23, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Canada. Bearcat (talk) 14:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure if it's enough, but I've now added coverage of him in Billboard and CBC. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 03:07, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - no indication that he's been recognized for his work, and references provided aren't convincing that he would meet WP:GNG.  PK  T (alk)  18:18, 29 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.