Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deogen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Inappropriate non-admin relist. WP:REFUND applies. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:56, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Deogen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable, based on a single source. I can't find any info online that wasn't just copypasted from this article, and I can't even find any evidence that the cited source, or its author, even exist. DanFromAnotherPlace (talk) 10:23, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. I've searched for the title of the source book (in both the original and in English), and also searched for the author: the only hits post-date the creation of this page and, as says, they appear to be based on the Wikipedia page. It's either a hoax page that's flown under the radar for nearly eight years, or  has a very rare book ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 17:38, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions.   C Thomas3   (talk) 19:01, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:01, 1 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.