Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deon Swiggs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 16:03, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Deon Swiggs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I do not see that there is any sufficiently notable accomplishment for an article.  DGG ( talk ) 05:08, 9 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Mr. Swiggs is a highly influential person in Christchurch, and has the same standing as Sam Johnson (activist) from the SVA.  LukeChandlerNZ ( talk ) 11:42PM, 9 July 2013 NZST
 * Comment I'm an avid reader of the Christchurch Press and cannot remember even a single article that mentions him (I do see that the article references The Press, though), whereas Sam Johnson gets very frequently reported. My experience thus does not align with LukeChandlerNZ's statement above.  Schwede 66  18:47, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Can say that you must not be reading it as often as I do to see him mentioned quite a bit, 'The Press' shows that there is 16 results for him. And this article paints him in the same light as Johnson  LukeChandlerNZ ( talk ) 12:32 PM NZST July 11 2013
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 9 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Was researching Swiggs for a him to present key note presentation on community resilience for us and found this wiki useful. Have also tried to add more content to the page to make it more substantial.  Diamante123 ( talk ) 11:42PM, 10 July 2013 NZST
 * Keep as a quick look through the article and media coverage points to national interest in him. Not as high as some of the people involved in the quakes, but certainly enough to meet WP:GNG NealeFamily (talk) 10:31, 18 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 17:27, 18 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, does not appear to meet WP:BIO. I would invite the closing admin to give lower weight to the posts by the two very new users above. Stifle (talk) 17:44, 27 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment Un sure if you've read WP:BIO but I suggest you check again.  LukeChandlerNZ ( talk ) 29 July 2013 7:43pm NZST —Preceding undated comment added 07:44, 29 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Not significant enough media coverage. A few of the sources are published by the subject or his organisation. The closing admin should note that appears to be a sockpuppet of . &mdash;Adabow (talk) 23:21, 27 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment I only have one user on here, cheers.  LukeChandlerNZ ( talk ) 29 July 2013 7:40pm NZST —Preceding undated comment added 07:40, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.