Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deontay Burnett


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Closing a bit early since it's WP:SNOWing in sunny Southern California. ansh 666 09:27, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Deontay Burnett

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-pro player. Not notable Legacypac (talk) 18:17, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  18:21, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  18:21, 19 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete single editor contribution suggests possible WP:COI written as WP:PROMO and fails GNG --EC Racing (talk) 19:22, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes GNG WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 20:34, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment College football players generally aren't notable, unless they win a significant national award (for WP:ANYBIO#1).  I don't know what the "All-Bowl team" is, but I don't think that qualifies as a significant award.  However, the coverage is close to meeting WP:GNG.  power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 00:13, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes WP:GNG per sources cited by WikiOriginal-9. Cbl62 (talk) 01:14, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:GNG, per WikiOriginal-9's sources and research. Ejgreen77 (talk) 01:42, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep passes GNG per the sources provided above by WikiOriginal-9. Lepricavark (talk) 02:03, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep single editor is a non-issue for me because the content looks okay so there's not real policy violation. Sources presented seem to pass WP:GNG easily.  LA Times, Detroit News, ESPN...--Paul McDonald (talk) 12:31, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Sourcing clearly shows notability and passes WP:GNG. --  Dane talk  20:09, 22 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.