Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Depa Billaba


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 03:53, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Depa Billaba

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Way too much detail for such a minor character. Should be merged to a minor characters section. JuJube (talk) 10:54, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge per nom.-- RyRy5  Got something to say?   14:20, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Wait a sec, you want to delete and merge becuase the article has too much detail? The fact that so much can be written on something so small makes it worthy of its own article.--Jaeger123 (talk) 14:23, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Or that it's mainly fancruft. JuJube (talk) 15:39, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Fancruft, no evidence of outside notability.  //   Chris  (complaints) • (contribs) 16:00, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak merge to a list of minor characters section. Subject is actually a fairly major character in several books and comics; in the field of lightsaber combat, she is especially notable as one of a handful of users of the Vaapad lightsaber form, but there isn't much in the way of real-world notability.  Celarnor Talk to me  18:18, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge or delete, but preferably merge. She's just not notable enough for her own article. Since she is a Padawan of Mace Windu, a Jedi Master from Coruscant, a member of the species of "Chalactan" people, and a Jedi who falls to the Dark Side, I'm sure there's plenty of places to properly fit her in. ~ Wakanda's Black Panther! (contribs) 00:38, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge per Celarnor. As it was written, this article cannot stand on its own as cleanup would not really be an option here. B.Wind (talk) 03:43, 21 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.