Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Department of Historical and Artistic Heritage of the Diocese of Beja


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. J04n(talk page) 13:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Department of Historical and Artistic Heritage of the Diocese of Beja

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I cannot see why a minor department of the government of diocese of Portugal is notable. I do not know Portugese, but most search results seem to be dictionary listings.

(This article was created by an editor who created and edited only one other article, that of the Department's head, a José António Falcão. I am uncertain about the latter's notability, though he may be notable as an academic.)

הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) 23:06, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions.  הסרפד  (call me Hasirpad) 23:09, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  הסרפד  (call me Hasirpad) 23:13, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 1 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to the director, who is apparently notable as an academic and author.&#39;DGG (at NYPL) (talk) 20:22, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If redirecting to the director's article is to be considered, that article needs to be scrutinized as well. הסרפד  (call me Hasirpad) 22:31, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to an appropriate local government page, where we might mention the director, instead? I think DGG's suggestion is good, but I'm worried about what happens when the director moves on. Ray  Talk 21:42, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak keep The Portuguese article on the topic cites a number of references: two or three of them seem to be primary, but the rest don't. However, I don't read Portuguese, so I can only assume that enough of them are reliable to let this pass WP:GNG. (By the way, I'm not criticising the nominator for not looking at the Portuguese article: Wikidata had failed to connect them). PWilkinson (talk) 13:17, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 00:45, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  00:25, 14 May 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.