Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Department of Technical Education (India)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Nomination withdrawn, in essence. Moved article to more accurate title. Non-admin closure. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ bomb  02:36, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Department of Technical Education (India)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

naveenpf (talk) 16:48, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment What is the rationale for deletion? ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ  bomb  17:56, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. I suggest that the nominator would be wise to withdraw this AfD. Greglocock (talk) 00:15, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

--naveenpf (talk) 17:30, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong keep - important organization that administers education institutes. VasuVR  ( talk,  contribs ) 04:42, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep notable enough. Needs improvement not deletion. Nom has not specified his argument for deletion. &mdash; Abhishek  Talk to me 05:20, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Speady keep: per above.  Dewritech (talk)  10:45, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong delete There is no department like that .Department of Higher Education is divided into eight Bureaux. in that one is Technical Education


 * Comment: Note that the above comment is from the original nominator. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 17:32, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Question for Nom Is your concern that the article topic is more accurately referred to as the Bureau of Technical Education? Would moving the article to that name and revising the copy address your concerns? I've tried to read a bit more about this organization and, frankly, I can't quite tell if it truly exists as an organization (meaning I'm not sure if it's an actual organization or just a named umbrella sitting on top of a set of organizations), so I just want to clarify what your concern is before voicing my own opinion on this. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ  bomb  21:58, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually the title confused me, that is why requested for AfD. Moving the article is more that enough. Sorry guys for the trouble. Meantime I welcome you all to budding project WP:INEI --naveenpf (talk) 02:04, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * No trouble at all; your efforts will result in this article having a more accurate name, so that's a net positive, eh? I'm going to move the article to the new name and non-admin close this AfD given this point of clarity. Thanks for clarifying! Best, ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ  bomb  02:30, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.