Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Depreciation of goodwill/dilution in trademark law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Trademark dilution. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 12:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Depreciation of goodwill/dilution in trademark law
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Appears to be duplicate to Trademark dilution, though I am not an expert. Since the article appears mostly to address the concept in Canadian law a merge may be in order, but I'm listing at AfD to get more input on this. Prodego talk  22:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I prodded this article earlier today, and the reasoning still stands "Essay and how-to" in addition to the evidence brought up by Prodego. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 22:47, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge there is sourced content worth keeping --Guerillero &#124; My Talk  22:49, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge though the content that is sourced is mainly primary sources, and WP:SYNTH is on the lurk, it could provide valuable material for the other article. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:52, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 8 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge into Trademark dilution, which is the nom's second choice. If nobody can do it, then a redirect will save the history. Bearian (talk) 21:15, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.