Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deptford Fun City Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was kept clear consensus to keep Pegasus1138 Talk 16:48, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Deptford Fun City Records
Has only been edited by one user throughout its history, and has been a stub throughout. Google search results in roughly 41,000 hits, with the first page of hits mostly copies of this article. Does not appear to meet notability requirements. Would have PROD'd the article, but would most likely be contested. --Impaciente 18:26, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 *  Delete . Google search returns 67 unique hits, not 41,000 . No assertion of importance in article and unverified. By the way, an article that has been sporadically edited by one user, with the last edit 2 months ago, seems like a perfect prod candidate, and much less likely to have its prod removed than a brand new article. Afd taxes resources to a much greater extent than does prod.--Fuhghettaboutit 19:00, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Change to keep based on Andrew Lenahan and Capitalistroadster's research.--Fuhghettaboutit 12:55, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I believe the fact that it's only been edited by one user means that user would most likely contest it, but I'll keep your suggestion in mind. --Impaciente 07:51, 29 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep 1970s UK punk label. Does seem to have had a handful of notable releases, such as most of the early output of Alternative TV.  Also notable as the label where Squeeze got their start.  Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  19:26, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article is a substub. I would expand it with Andrew Lenahan's comments above and the fact that Miles Copeland, a significant figure in music history, founded it see Capitalistroadster 02:27, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep and expand, and mainly because I'm a Squeeze fan. -- GWO
 * Keep Plenty of labels with much less significance have articles, somebody just needs to write this one. -- Mrmctorso 23:52, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Faulty Products and tag r with possibilities. No point having a one-liner on the subject, but no prejudice against a proper article being created. Stifle (talk) 22:57, 1 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.