Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Depths (novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 20:21, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Depths (novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BOOK. Has been listed as non-notable since December 2017. Lettlerhello 16:09, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello 16:09, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello 16:09, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello 16:09, 8 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep - The article is in poor shape, but there are plenty of reviews in reliable sources. Just a quick search brings up ones in The New York Times, The Guardian, and The Independent.  And that is just English sources, which already passes the WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK.  I haven't even looked into the likely Swedish sources under its Swedish name of Djup.  Rorshacma (talk) 16:20, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per the reviews cited by Rorshacma. — Toughpigs (talk) 16:42, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - article needs improvements but that is no reason for delete. Per WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 11:12, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep sources provided by Rorshacma show notability. Article does need work.  // Timothy ::  talk  06:07, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep; the sources Rorshacma has found are sufficient to pass WP:NBOOK #1. I shall attempt to work them into the article. Wham2001 (talk) 10:30, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per all of the above. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 13:14, 15 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.