Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deputy leader


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:19, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Deputy leader

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't seem particularly noteworthy. Alligators1974 (talk) 22:55, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - Very noteworthy; linked from heaps of articles. Possible early close?  J 947  22:59, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:59, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:59, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:00, 2 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - Lots of great references and is a crucial position. I see no reason to debate over it further.Brotherlandpol (talk) 03:04, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Clear mistake by nominator! Agree with above comments. Very noteworthy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjimenez91 (talk • contribs) 04:43, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'll grant that the article needs some referencing improvement, but this is a notable concept and an important political role that exists in several countries. Bearcat (talk) 06:29, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly notable position that exists in many political parties worldwide. AusLondonder (talk) 06:41, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: Clearly notable with plenty of sources. Usually the second most senior position in a party and does exist across the globe. TheMagikCow (talk) 07:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)


 * withdraw nomination Seems a pretty resounding consensus. Alligators1974 (talk) 13:35, 2 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.