Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Der letzte Patriot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 21:36, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Der letzte Patriot

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable book, by a marginal author --Galassi (talk) 15:42, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems like advertising. Non notable too Letsdrinktea (talk) 21:26, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No third-party notable sources indicating this is sufficiently important. Possible conflict of interest too. --Folantin (talk) 21:28, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Do not Delete It is a notable, much discussed novel in Germany, it may not be "mainstream", but it is no less important than literary massproducts. Wikipedia goes there, where others do not go ... I thought. Hyperboreer 21:47, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete."Diese Seite existiert nicht" on the de Wikipedia (that's equivalent to "Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name" on the en Wikipedia). Unavailable on Amazon.de; granted, a five star review there but from a total of two reviewers - hardly the signs of a "notable, much discussed novel". This makes it look like a pretty good read (though I note the contact mail link on there is hardly a disinterested party). WP:NB has guidelines - Der letzte Patriot doesn't appear to meet them. Tonywalton Talk 23:35, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete." My understanding is that a similar plug was previously deleted on the German wiki. And the author's own entry was deleted as well: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andreas_J._Voigt --Galassi (talk) 01:23, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete I read this book and it was inspiring!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyperboreer (talk • contribs)
 * Comment Hyperboreer was the author of the article under discussion. Hyperboreer, you're welcome to comment on this page but please state if you are not a disinterested party. Tonywalton Talk 17:21, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Hyperboreer, remember this is not a "vote", it is a discussion to obtain consensus: I say this since you have "voted" twice.  Thanks, Antandrus  (talk) 03:35, 24 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. Opus33 (talk) 15:11, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Galassi's finds on de.wiki. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 04:26, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete It's not currently sold by/on amazon.de (and you can usually get every crap there in various editions). de:Wikipedia:Löschkandidaten/17._Februar_2009 (de.wiki's AFD for the author) mentions POV and lack of notability as well, and it resulted in three speedy deletes and salting. – sgeureka t•c 13:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete This book is nazi stuff. It is published by Neuteutonia. Go to their webpage and get directed to an online shop. The T-shirt at the picture reads "GEGEN NAZIS ist kein Kampf zu gewinnen", roughly "AGAINST NAZIS all resistance is futile". Der letzte Patriot is not much discussed in Germany. Just like the book, this article is absolutely nonrelevant. Henning Blatt (talk) 18:21, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * "Gegen POV und fehlender Relevanz sind alle Kämpfe zu gewinnen", I'd have said (All struggles can prevail against POV and NN). This AfD isn't against the content of the work, it's attempting to determne whether it complies with enough guidelines of notability to remain here (which thus far it doesn't appear to). Though Mein Kampf is execrably-written and ideologically rather unsound it remains on Wikipedia as it is a bit notable. Tonywalton Talk 00:24, 25 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment do I smell snow in the air? Tonywalton Talk 00:07, 25 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.