Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derecession


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Jamie ☆ S93  20:38, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Derecession

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Repeatedly recreated, unreferenced protologism, original research. Speedys removed, PROD removed, here as last resort. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 21:19, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

*please close discussion, article was deleted while I was nominating for AfD. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 21:23, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I G6 tagged the second afd, let's keep this one open. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 21:52, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Done.  Jamie ☆ S93  22:03, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

This term has been used since Jan 2008. However, the term has been increasingly used in the last three months. This word is no different than stagflation which became a "formal" term in the 1970's. As the term is becoming more generally accepted, it is beyond reason that the article should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beach98 (talk • contribs) 21:55, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Do you have any sources that show its use, history, etc.? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:04, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * There are a number a references used by people on message boards. Googling the term "derecession" returns over 30 places of usage. In March, 2009, searches on the term only returned about 8 usages. The term is a good term since this recession is different from the others (i.e. housing crisis, auto crisis, etc)Beach98 (talk) 22:12, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Blogs and message boards are not Reliable sources. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 22:15, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The term is being used more frequently by different people. This information could help better identify the current economic crisis (stagflation, the great depression, post-war recession, etc.)Beach98 (talk) 22:28, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * You're clearly not getting something here. Do you have RELIABLE SOURCES that prove its use and describe the term in detail? Not blogs, not message boards. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment Forums should not count as sources.-- The Legendary   Sky Attacker  23:24, 22 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Total neologism. I think this kind of article was why WP:NEO was written. It's very newly coined, it hasn't gained widespread use, and no reliable sources have even used it, let alone defined or discussed it. Fences and windows (talk) 01:34, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable neologism. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No WP:RS supports this. Johnuniq (talk) 09:34, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NEO Take it to Urban Dictionary. Drawn Some (talk) 12:11, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete absolutely no proof that this is anything beyond a neologism. JuJube (talk) 09:29, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.