Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek H. Potts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedily deleted as copyvio by Randykitty (talk) 22:16, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Derek H. Potts

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Impeccably formatted article with lots of references created in just 4 edits by a new editor. Deceptively well-sourced. (Likely paid editing.) Minor award and limited coverage not above what can be expected of any lawyer. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO, hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 09:30, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:57, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:57, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:57, 31 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep Thanks for mentioning its flawless, I have been researching for 2 months to post articles in wiki and Thanks for the comment . May i know the reason why its shows such a template ? The article got enough news articles compared to similar articles . And I wrote this article with Bryan Aylstock as reference, it got even less news mention. Fimiosilana (talk) 14:06, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: I did not say that it was "flawless". It's deeply flawed. I said it is "[i]mpeccably formatted", something quite different. As for Bryan Aylstock, please see WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. --Randykitty (talk) 14:21, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment : impeccably means flawless, whatever as I am new here , I can learn only by looking at other articles. Its unacceptable than you see flaws with this page and not with the similar other page ? Moreover the awards mentioned in the page are prestigious awards, Awards see the link . Fimiosilana (talk) 16:23, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The formatting is impeccable, not the contents. Whatever. As for other pages, if they are deficient, you're welcome to propose them for deletion yourself. This is not the place to discuss their merits or lack thereof, here we are solely concerned with the article on Derek H. Potts. And, no, as far as I can see, the awards are rather minor. --Randykitty (talk) 16:34, 31 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Too much is copied and pasted from http://www.potts-law.com/attorneys-2/derek-potts/ Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 20:45, 31 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.