Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Morgan (Criminal Minds) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to List of Criminal Minds characters. Complex / Rational 18:06, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Derek Morgan (Criminal Minds)
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The article has a lot of WP:CRUFT with no proof of notability, mostly primary references, and a quick Google search does not give any sources that prove individual notability, and per WP:N, it is not worth a standalone article. If the character is not notable, I suggest a redirect and/or merge to List of Criminal Minds characters. Spinixster  (chat!)  09:34, 26 September 2023 (UTC) "Redirect, as this could be considered a subtopic and just deleting it wouldn't be helpful.  -  Sumanuil  .  (talk to me) 06:08, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy,  and Television.  Spinixster   (chat!)  09:34, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect. This time we have a Reception section, limited to the sentence "Morgan was included in TV Guide's list of "TV's Sexiest Crime Fighters"." If anyone thinks this is not the very definition of laughable, raise your hand. For me, well, this is an obvious fail of GNG in need of redirecting if not deletion (but since redirects are WP:CHEAP, let's be merciful...). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:43, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy Restore Redirect - This was just Redirected via an AFD consensus a couple of weeks ago, and then the article was reverted back to an article with absolutely no changes. This should not even be at AFD again - it should just be immediately reverted back to the redirect that was already decided on, and then protected to keep this from happening again. Rorshacma (talk) 19:58, 27 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.