Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Peterson (entrepreneur)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 15:54, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Derek Peterson (entrepreneur)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NBIO. The coverage is only routine coverage and interviews. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:37, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Ammarpad (talk) 18:59, 26 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete getting on the 100 most influential people in Orange County for a given year is absolutely not a sign of notability, but the closest to notability he comes.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:16, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above, article created by someone at his company, then other paid edits, being one of 100 most influential people in Orange County in no way confers any notability whatsoever. Theroadislong (talk) 14:55, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep CEO of a major corporation. First cannabis company to be listed on Wall Street and major player in the cannabis trade Wikilover2604 (talk) 20:51, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * and you have been paid by Derek Peterson to write it! Theroadislong (talk) 21:07, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

I have been paid. I disclosed the edit complying with the disclosure policy and put it in the draft space first. Did I miss out on something? He has got features on cnn, telegraph etc. Is that coverage not sufficient? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikilover2604 (talk • contribs) 01:12, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:BASIC/WP:GNG. Article was started by User:Terratechcorp and was edited by paid editor Wikilover2604. It's not he kind of love Wikipedia needs. Sam Sailor 01:40, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Quickfingers (talk) 01:42, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, no depth of coverage and Wikipedia is not for promotion. Bishonen &#124; talk 01:53, 30 December 2017 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.