Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Rasmussen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 11:14, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Derek Rasmussen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a policy advisor, not reliably sourced as the subject of any significant media coverage for the purposes of clearing GNG. As always, people are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist -- but this makes no particularly strong notability claim beyond the fact that he exists, and is referenced entirely to his own bylined writing about other things, where the notability test is being the subject of coverage written by other people. Bearcat (talk) 21:34, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 21:34, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 21:34, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: claims that the subject has many citations on Google scholar, so I'll give another week to see if WP:PROF is met.
 * delete he may have done good work, but there is not enough written about him to support the idea that he is notable.NotButtigieg (talk) 06:53, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete- No claim to notability.--Rusf10 (talk) 23:36, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - there seem to be many citations on Google scholar. Bearian (talk) 20:24, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly fails WP:GNG, there's not a secondary source in the entire article. SportingFlyer  T · C  04:43, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ミラP 00:11, 9 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.