Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek William Nicoll


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Denelson83 02:22, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Derek William Nicoll
This person seems to exist, and may even deserve a page, but the content is completely inappropriate at this point. Although in some ways it's fascinating in its details, with a non-linear, almost nonsensicsal, structure that is reminicant of the American Postmodernism movement in literature, the article offers no set of facts for a reader's understanding of the topic. Andicat 01:03, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as vainglorious nonsense. Eddie.willers 02:20, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete seems to be a joke or hoax, one which 'real' Derek William Nicoll's are not likely to appreciate http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Derek William Nicoll%22&btnG=Google Search FRS 02:28, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete outrageous. nn. per frs. --->Newyorktimescrossword 03:00, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete here claims no notability, although Human-computer interaction does for someone of the same name jnothman talk 03:15, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with nom.  Contributor could consider submitting to The New Yorker or a literary mag, but not appropriate for WP. &mdash; Gaff  ταλκ 05:14, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Dottore So 10:16, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete bio(?) of a non-notable person... or a prose piece. Either way, not suitable for wikipedia.--Isotope23 14:35, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete either a NN bio or a hoax. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 14:51, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Articles like this are where Everything2 holds the edge. An interesting piece of writing, but inappropriate for our pages. Delete D e nni &#9775; 05:06, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Userify this. Klonimus 05:40, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, what Konimus said. Perhaps the user who created it would like to move it to his/her user page. HGB 00:59, 10 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.