Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derelict Liverpool


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy deleted - non-notable, website does not yet exist so article is nonsense, spamvertisement, etc.... ➨ ≡ Я Ξ  DVΞRS ≡ 20:10, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Derelict Liverpool
NN Website, author removed prod tag. Does not pass WP:WEB J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 19:24, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Website does not exist J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA 19:26, 30 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nomination - just looks like ad for non-notable website -- Middenface 19:26, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

You are clearly wrong. If you had bothered to read the article, you would have clealry understood that the website is currently undergoing some changes. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.42.96.105 (talk • contribs).


 * Delete Since the site isn't even up yet, it can't remotely be considered as notable. Fan1967 19:48, 30 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.