Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DermaBlade


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:Yunshui under criterion G12 (copyright infringement). (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

DermaBlade

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Another article by a PR Agency, this one a non-notable trademarked surgical blade. Judging by the URL's in the article (now surgically removed), it was also designed to promote a private cosmetic surgery company. The Dermablade has received some attention in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology but the other sources are about the surgical procedure, not DermaBlade. Fails WP:GNG. Sionk (talk) 00:14, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 8 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Not seeing the media coverage required. The existing refs don't provide detailed coverage: there are are 3 refs in the article to one short paragraph in the book Dermatological Surgery, and the Primary Care Dermatology Society newsletter doesn't have details. The article reads like a press release. If there was an article on the manufacturer, Personna, we might be able to merge there, but not sure if they're notable either. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:03, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete for copyright it's almost a straight paste of the article "Surgical pearl: a flexible scalpel for shave excision of skin lesions", from the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Captain Conundrum (talk) 11:06, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.