Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dermaflage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:41, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Dermaflage

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not sure this is notable Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 09:59, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, author of this article here - I'm doing my best to create a non-biased article about this company. At the advice of some of the editors I've made the article as neutral as possible, and I'm happy to continue editing the article if needed. I do believe this entry fits the criteria as notable - it's been written about in many credible news sources, and is a legitimate entity. Please let me know what more I can do to fit the Wikipedia guidelines. Thanks, Evan Evkatz4 (talk) 17:06, 1 February 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:44, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete at best and draft & userfy if needed as the current article is still questionable. SwisterTwister   talk  02:59, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Evkatz4, you asked what you can do. The main thing you could do would be to find good sources. Right now you have 2 patent sources (patents do not support notability, see wp:corp on that); 2 articles in the Memphis Daily news, which is a local paper and notability requires at least regional but preferably national coverage for companies; and 1 short blog post from the Dallas Morning News which doesn't say much about the company. When I do a lookup on Dermaflage I mainly get a lot of sales sites. So all of that adds up to -- not notable (at this time). If the product is new then it may be notable some time in the future. LaMona (talk) 08:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.