Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derrick Milano (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The only two arguments to keep fail to provide any policy-based reasons and are from users with very limited editing history. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:25, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Derrick Milano
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:MUSICBIO. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:26, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 16:48, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 16:48, 17 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep notable rapper who achieved viral success which led him to touring nationally and working with other notable musicians ie. Rich The Kid and August Alsina.NotLazyAnymore (talk) 20:54, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Derrick Milano is a notable rapper and other notable artists tap him to feature on their projects and his releases are covered by major music publications. Young Money (talk) 23:12, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The Vibe article you linked to is four sentences long. Did I miss the rest of it, or are those four sentences intended to establish his "viral" notability on Wikipedia?  Magnolia677 (talk) 23:35, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete a non-notable rapper.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:32, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 21:27, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources consist of subject talking about himself; database listings (such as MTV.com); and sites that post videos with promotional text. It lacks independent, third party coverage that would convey notability. Arguments to keep based on the subjects collaborations are not backed up with significant coverage, apparently claiming notability by association. ShelbyMarion (talk) 00:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.