Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dervo Sejdić


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Sejdić and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina. The source assessment by Sirdog is persuasive and remains unrebutted.  Sandstein  09:09, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Dervo Sejdić

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Seems to be non-notable, the majority of the content is already mentioned in Sejdić and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina. Any articles in Bosnian might be of some help. Mooonswimmer 02:55, 29 October 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  03:41, 5 November 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  03:26, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Shellwood (talk) 08:14, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: the person is from a persecuted Roma community. Coverage exists like, this source calls him a prominent Roma leader, , , , . There are about 500 results, just in Google News, and then ton of books - easy WP:GNG pass. 31.205.13.161 (talk) 17:07, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak keep about the same level of an article on the Italian wiki, with some links mentioned above. This needs a rewrite though. Oaktree b (talk) 03:38, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Sejdić and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina. I've prepared a source assessment table (note I used Google Translate for non-English sources), and I'm not finding too much more aside from these. His real notable quality is his involvement in the constitution case but doesn't seem to be notable outside of that, I don't think an article is warranted here. More than happy to be proven wrong, though. — Sirdog (talk) 07:26, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:07, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * I agree with — Sirdog 's assessment; the subject on his own is not notable, but his involvement in Sejdić and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina is. Outside of this coverage there is not enough information to even justify a stand alone article. Chagropango (talk) 06:54, 19 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.