Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Des Webb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. To match the limited sources, we have limited discussion. If a few obituaries come to light, they could form the basis of an article. The optional redirect wouldn't give any real encyclopedic information about the subject, without there being undue weight there. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 01:58, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Des Webb

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable actor with a grand total of three extremely minor, nonspeaking (unless I'm mistaken) roles. He is not the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 20:22, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Star Wars species (U–Z) or Delete. This seems to be his signature role, so it's not entirely unreasonable to expect it to redirect to the Wampa article. Or just delete.  Either is fine.  I'm sure he's got a detailed article on the Star Wars wikia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:29, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 12:50, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 12:50, 8 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Sources include the New York Times, books and common others, like IMDB. He had a role in one of the biggest movie franchises of all time. –kbabej (talk) 8:09, 10 January 2014 (PST)
 * That's not really a NYT source; it's hosted on the NYT website, but comes from All Media Guide, which, as their name implies, attempts to cover all media, not only those things which are notable. If the NYT had covered him, that might be a different story. IMDB, Wikia etc. are user-generated and are not admissible as sources, and the book references are extremely trivial - literally his name in the cast list and that sort of thing. This does not attest notability. You should know this. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 22:35, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:40, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 08:16, 25 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.