Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desempacotamento


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Rx StrangeLove 14:54, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

Desempacotamento
The assertion that "Desempacotamento belongs to the top [pub quiz] teams in The Netherlands" notwithstanding, this does not appear to be notable.--Ashenai 11:15, 29 September 2005 (UTC) Google seems oblivious to any mention of this team other than their own website (though not knowing Dutch, it's difficult to tell). --Ashenai 11:15, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Playing pubquiz is a very serious business in Holland and is fast becoming an inseparable part of the Dutch identity. Considering the growing importance of the pubquiz in Holland it is in fact notable to be a top quiz team. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.171.208.225 (talk • contribs), at 16:50, 2005 September 29. First edit.
 * Delete, this is similar to online gaming clans, who are also regularly deleted. Playing pub quizes may be serious for the members of this team, but: "Playing pubquiz is a very serious business in Holland and is fast becoming an inseparable part of the Dutch identity." is seriously overstated. I am from the Netherlands and study in Utrecht and haven't come across any pub quiz players in the 5 years I've been studying here. If this was as serious as claimed, I would've at least seen more announcements and come across fellow students and PhDs playing which I have not. - Mgm|(talk) 08:31, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, MgM's remark about not having come across players in the last 5 years in Utrecht is irrelevant. I've lived in Utrecht for 9 years and have not met any Mah-Jong players in that period. Despite that, I would welcome a Wikipedia-page about the best Mah-Jong players in Holland. Besides, MgM uses his own rather limited empirical experience as argument, which doesn't do much to help his case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.171.208.225 (talk • contribs), at 17:25, 2005 October 10. Second edit.
 * Delete per Mgm's magical analysis. -- BD2412 talk 14:52, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:V, WP:N. enceph  alon  10:47, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.