Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desenrascanço


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:52, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Desenrascanço


Delete per Wikipedia is not a Portugese dictionary, WP:OR and the fact that certain passages are simply rambling nonsense. MartinDK 13:25, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I'd support a "keep" proposal, if I thought that this was something known outside Portugal. Do we have a specfically Portuguese Wiki ?  Or an article on Portuguese socio-political vocabulary ?  Absent these, I can't see a place for this. -- Simon Cursitor 08:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, there is a Portuguese Wikipedia. Andrew Levine 08:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I would definitely keep this article. In fact, both the word and the concept have been referred to in some conversations that I have had in English, at least in the UK. Moreover, the article is quite a complete entry. Filipe Josue 18:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * — Filipejosue (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Demiurge 15:53, 21 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete It might be possible to write an article about this term, but everything in this article that isn't a dictionary definition is original research and unsourced. ~ trialsanderrors 00:50, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * delete - per nom -- Kungfu Adam ( talk ) 15:20, 21 November 2006 (UTC)


 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Kungfu Adam  ( talk ) 15:21, 21 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:BOLLOCKS. Note that pt wikipedia has no corresponding entry . Demiurge 15:33, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Although it's a widely known slang word in Portugal, this doesn't merit an article on the English Wikipedia (not even on the Portuguese Wikipedia would this survive). Besides, it's just a blatant original research, unsourced/unverifiable and complete WP:BOLLOCKS.-- Hús  ö  nd  21:29, 21 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.