Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deseo Inherente


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Aoidh (talk) 02:58, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Deseo Inherente

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The source is a fake leak with a stock image barcode from shutterstock and a misspelled address, see here: https://mobile.twitter.com/ashmebarak/status/1639692971330228233/photo/1 1arch (talk) 19:27, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. 1arch (talk) 19:27, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello, I participate in this consultation, but I do not think it is necessary to delete the page. I already saw the source but it is that in the news they say that the name of the album and the track list has been leaked but the account itself is Ash Mebarak; Shakira does not say her official account but the record companies are not lying because I mean the company is Sony Music Latin and I don't think it's a lie. Saúl Rodrigo Martínez (talk) 19:46, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Check the article because I've seen on the news that Ed Sheeran is also working with Shakira for her new album. Saúl Rodrigo Martínez (talk) 19:48, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * But trust the record companies because the companies never lie if it's an album produced by Shakira she says everything is true so let's trust Saúl Rodrigo Martínez (talk) 19:49, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete some sort of scam? I can't find anything about this "thing" and the sourcing is silly. Oaktree b (talk) 19:59, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:05, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete or Draftity. Sources 1 to 6 are not about the album, and the only source discussing the album simply says that the track listing and title were leaked from an alleged back cover image. (CC) Tb hotch ™ 20:20, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * It's that, I mean, it's not a scam if I already saw the news, also check the references that refer to the album I put few because the rest are from google amp and a filter does not let me add these types of links so I do not add many but it would be better if Remove the google amp link from the blacklist in order to provide more details as in Spanish Wikipedia Saúl Rodrigo Martínez (talk) 20:36, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * But deleting it is not necessary because for me what the company Sony Music Latin said is true because perhaps Shakira had mentioned that she is working on the new album. Saúl Rodrigo Martínez (talk) 20:38, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Also, I already saw the account that posted that on Twitter as false, but I don't think it's false if the singer Shakira has never lied to us. I checked the account and it says Ash Mebarak, it doesn't say the official name of the Shakira account, so maybe the Ash Mebarak account is fake. Saúl Rodrigo Martínez (talk) 20:40, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Merely existing is not a reason to keep a page. If you remove the background, there is nothing left that cannot be discussed in a single sentence at Shakira. WP:NMUSIC has a very low threshold for inclusion and this article doesn't satisfy it mainly because it is an article that is based on rumors. (CC) Tb hotch ™ 20:41, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, but the information in the article can change frequently depending on the news, but for this reason the page should not be deleted because obviously the new Shakira album that it announces must be true. Saúl Rodrigo Martínez (talk) 21:21, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I can see that you are a new editor. Because of that, you do not seem to understand how the English Wikipedia works. We don't create articles that are based on allegations. Shakira hasn't mention this album exists. Sony Latin has not say this album exists. The WP:BURDEN of the sources discussing the album relies on a image that can be created by any person with Photoshop. (CC)  Tb hotch ™ 00:43, 27 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete: regardless of whether it's fake or not, I see zero coverage of this album. Shakira is a huge star; if she had actually announced a new album, every pop music publication would have an article on it already. The lack of reliable publications (and not some random Twitter account) writing about this means there should be no article. QuietHere (talk &#124; contributions) 21:24, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Pure speculation, zero coverage of this album. ItsMario97 (talk) 22:37, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, I don't think it's necessary to delete the page, if what Sony Music Latin has published about Shakira's new album is true, then it has to be obvious because record companies don't lie. Saúl Rodrigo Martínez (talk) 00:00, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * "Record companies never lie, let's just trust them". Record companies are well known for outright lying about how many copies their artists' albums have sold. They inflate numbers all the time. They've engaged in payola, and engage in shady things around artists they want to protect. How many years did R. Kelly's record label protect him while receiving reports of what he was doing and has now been convicted for? Be real.  Ss  112   08:23, 27 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. No official, reliable confirmation exists.  Ss  112   08:23, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Snow Delete - best case scenario it is WP:TOOSOON for this article. Worst case, it's a hoax of sorts. Either way, it's premature to have this article. Sergecross73   msg me  12:46, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - If the title, tracklist, or even the near-future existence of a new album from a superstar like Shakira were real, we would get it from far more reliable sources than the hacks who are talking about "Deseo Inherente". Nobody anywhere in the reliable media has reported on this. The story is probably clickbait to generate money for online shysters; let's not contribute to that here. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 13:44, 27 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete - Seems like a hoax to me. I assume the page is being used to present reliability in some sort of scam (e.g, selling the album on a third-party website). ImperialMajority (talk) 14:46, 28 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete per the above discussion. Aoba47 (talk) 19:57, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi how are things? I hope it's all okay. Well, regarding the article, I already checked the references and there are some that refer to Shakira's new album, also I don't think it seems false, probably without revealing it Shakira could have told Sony Music Latin that this will be the name of her new album and that will be the tracklist, so I don't think the article is misleading. Luis William Hernández García (talk) 21:32, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Here I also participate in this consultation in case you need any help from me, but I hope you understand me. Luis William Hernández García (talk) 21:33, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Sir, please take the time to learn more about how Wikipedia works. It does not matter if you checked the sources currently in the article, because those sources are unreliable, and they are either created by scammers or they are gullible gossip sites that repeat scammers. It also does not matter that Shakira "could have" told the record company about her future album. Here we need solid evidence that she DID really do that. This is an encyclopedia, not a rumor mill. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 13:57, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, but I'm telling you that the singer may have told Sony Music Latin about her new album Deseo Inherente without revealing it in a video or viralizing it on networks. Luis William Hernández García (talk) 18:21, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * It is not helpful to guess what "may have" happened. You can only use what reliable sources can confirm happened. You can guess what happened all day long, it won't help you save a Wikipedia article from deletion. Sergecross73   msg me  02:22, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. I have little to add to what has already been elaborated above. Shawn Teller (hy/hym) (talk) 19:59, 2 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.