Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deseret Museum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 00:03, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Deseret Museum

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Religious POV, no clear notability Noahhoward (talk) 18:37, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:15, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:15, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:15, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:15, 12 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep The Encyclopedia of Mormonism and the Utah Historical Quarterly are both respected scholarly sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:14, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep as has historic notability as shown in the multiple references already in the article that link to reliable book sources so passes WP:GNG and deserves to be included in Wikipedia Atlantic306 (talk) 14:44, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Perhaps even speedy (bad nom - religious POV is not a deletion reason). WP:NOTTEMPORARY - would a 50-year old present day majority museum be notable? Yes. Google books has a whole bunch of good hits, e.g. - . Icewhiz (talk) 13:41, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Subject matter is not relevant.  It throws up plenty of solid RS from independent sources (as listed above). It’s notable. Britishfinance (talk) 15:50, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. I see no religious POV. Spicemix (talk) 16:33, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Article has since been improved from original which described mission of museum "an institution dedicated to spreading knowledge". Noahhoward (talk) 17:55, 17 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep Invalid reason for deletion, institutions wit a religious POV can certainly be notable when, as here, sources exist.E.M.Gregory (talk) 01:08, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. wp:ITSAMUSEUM. --Doncram (talk) 19:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.