Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desert Conflict


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.--Adam (talk) 22:18, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Desert Conflict
Mod for Battlefield 1942. 207 unique Googles for searchstring ["Desert Conflict" "battlefield 1942" -wikipedia]. Most of these appear to be entries in "lists of mods" run by game fansites. Can't find any critival reviews. Article contents are little more than a list of the weapons and vehicles in the game mod. Information appears to be unverifiable through the use of reliable sources, and does not appear to meet the proposed guideline at Notability (software) -- Saberwyn 02:55, 1 April 2006 (UTC)


 * note. I moved the content of this article from Desert Combat back to its own article, where it had been dumped. ''This mod and Desert Combat should not be confused. -- Saberwyn 02:55, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Blast it to hell along with any other non-notable mods out there -- T B C [[Image:Confused-tpvgames.gif|18px|]] ???  ???   ??? 03:01, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as modcruft. Roy  boy cr ash  fan  [[Image:Flag of Texas.svg|30px]] 03:03, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn-mod. Stifle 23:17, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 * keep as revised -Sgt Simpson (4/4/06)
 * To my eye, the article still does not provide a counterpoint to any of the points I have raised in the deletion (ie very limited spread as per google, information is unverifiable through the use of reliable third party sources) -- Saberwyn 11:23, 5 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Its a mod in progress, therefore no reviews can be accomplished, 'battlefield 1942' was a full game released which Desert Combat was the mod, Desert Conflict comes out for 'Battlefield 2' sources can be viewed in the updates section -Sgt Simpson (4/5/06)
 * Unfortunately, when it comes to reliable, third-party sources, using your website as a source for your mod is equevilat to me writing an article on how I am king of a hidden colony of elves, and saying "To see that I am telling the truth, ring me". -- Saberwyn 10:01, 6 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Looks like it will be deleted then. I tend to agree with Saberwyn, even though I am a fan of the mod and thus biased. Jens Lyn IV 16:03, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Such a thing cannot be assumed, what he was talking about is trying to prove a fact, while the purpose of the website is to give information, not to convince opinions - Sgt Simpson 4/6/06


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.