Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desert Saints Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 13:15, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Desert Saints Magazine

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable periodical with limited scope and a lack of coverage in verifiable secondary sources. Could only find a passing mention in a regional newspaper column and an obituary that mentioned it. Seems to fail WP:V, WP:N, and WP:ORG. tedder (talk) 18:21, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fair amount of blog hits, but I'm not finding evidence of notability or reliable source coverage beyond directories and the ones cited by the nominator.  Baileypalblue (talk) 20:02, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. As a frequent editor among the Latter Day Saint articles, I've always been a bit surprised that this magazine as an article. In the extent of my knowledge, the magazine is non-notable. Even within Latter Day Saint-oriented sources, there is scarcely a mention of it. Good Ol’factory (talk) 21:10, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: does not appear to have significant coverage in secondary sources so fails the basic notabilty critera, SpitfireTally-ho! 05:48, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Spitfire. Ottre 11:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.