Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desert Tracks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:49, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Desert Tracks

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A single review in a niche publication is not sufficient to meet our notability guideline. Looking for further sources only produced some fora (and many unrelated travel pages) among the 73 Ghgits, and one book which mentions it in the bibliography Fram (talk) 07:36, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 07:36, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 07:36, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 07:36, 16 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete A nice book, but falls well short of the modest requirements of Notability (books)  Hawkeye7   (discuss)  22:33, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - I tried looking looking for sources for the book, as well as for its publisher, and came up with nothing in reliable sources regarding either of them. The single review in Dragon is not sufficient to pass the WP:GNG.  Rorshacma (talk) 19:36, 21 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.