Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Design42Day


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 16:17, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Design42Day

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Can't find any reliable sources about this company beyond a single interview in Vogue; not notable as far as I can tell. Sam Walton (talk) 00:00, 26 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. Dat GuyTalkContribs 20:33, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:48, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:48, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I originally deleted this, but an editor found some sources and requested that I reopen this. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:55, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not only was this accepted in July 2012 as this, it has not considerably improved despite all of the listed links, so this is best deleted for now until a better article can be made. SwisterTwister   talk  08:05, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:55, 4 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep, if I am not missing something, in addition to the already mentioned Vogue, the article contains multiple reliable sources, such as two articles from Corriere della Sera and an  article from  TgCom24 . The fact they are in Italian does not make them unreliable (eg.,  Corriere della Sera is the major and most authoritative newspaper in Italy). Cavarrone  15:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Could you clarify whether the second link is a blog post? The Google Translated page seems to suggest so but it might just be a bad translation. Likewise, the third article reads like some kind of press release, but may also just be down to the translation. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 15:54, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If you read WP:BLPSPS, there is a difference between "self-published blogs" (personal and group blogs, unreliable) and online columns hosted by news organizations and also called blogs, yet with editorial overview and written by professional journalists (reliable). Solferino 28 anni is an online column of the Corriere della Sera website Corriere.it focusing on themes of interest for under-thirty-readers and written by several professional journalists who are also active in the printed newspaper (including the author of the piece, Chiara Maffioletti). It even hosts articles just signed as "Redazione" or "La Redazione", which means "The Editorial Staff". And no, the article is not a press release, it is partly an overview of the company and partly an interview with the founders. Cavarrone  16:41, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:00, 11 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep – Meets WP:CORPDEPTH, albeit on the weaker side:, , , , (short article) . The article would benefit from copy editing. North America1000 07:42, 19 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.