Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DesignAShirt.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. WP:CSD, article about company that doesn't explain why it is notable. Mgm|(talk) 10:12, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

DesignAShirt.com

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:WEB.Article was created by an WP:SPA account with no other edits other than related to DesignAShirt.com. Has a few links but they are press releases and merely trivial coverage or mentions. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. which is clearly noted in the notability guidelines.. Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. Hu12 (talk) 20:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Corporate advert for non-notable company, creator is an SPA that also spammed the Zazzle and CafePress articles. Press releases are not acceptable references. § FreeRangeFrog 22:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam. Drmies (talk) 22:30, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no wp:reliable sources to establish notability. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 22:34, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete (G11) – SPAMalicious!!!! MuZemike 22:38, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Could also be per A7 as nothing seems to indicate why this company is remarkable in any way outside its own self-published material. MuZemike 22:40, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  01:12, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable company.  Matt  (  Talk  )   08:53, 20 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.