Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DesignCrowd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:09, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

DesignCrowd

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Delete. Non-notable website. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 05:29, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:25, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:25, 2 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 11:09, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Keep - Meets WP:WEBCRIT per sources in the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:27, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination: the article hardly makes a claim of notability. Nick-D (talk) 09:23, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 13:17, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:48, 23 October 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete Sources listed are an interview with the founders, an article saying they got venture capital, and an article saying they purchased a failing site. I am seeing some coverage of this company/website, but I'm just not finding significant coverage, which is a requirement for WP:ORG notability. --Breno talk 11:01, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.