Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Design Innovations (World of Warcraft)

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Woohookitty 10:41, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

Design Innovations (World of Warcraft)
Now im not 100% positive on this nomination, but I guess thats why we have this so we can discuss it. The whole article seems to smell of Original research, with the whole thing being a loose unstructured commentry on what some people feel is better in Warcraft than in previous MMORPG's. Because of this it also seems like the article will always be inheritantly and inescapably POV. UnlimitedAccess 02:04, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, personal essay.--nixie 02:05, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with UnlimitedAccess, it's original research. --Hoovernj 02:36, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Conditional Delete. Delete as original research, unless references are added.  --best, kevin  · · · Kzollman | Talk · · · 02:39, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * Conditional Keep if this is shown to be a general article, not a single-reveiewer POV piece, and if it does nto copyvio a recvent article in one or another gaming mag (IMHO it has that *flavour* to it, but I lack the resources.expertise to spot copyvios easily). --Simon Cursitor 08:05, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Not an article, but a fanboy review. Delete. --Calton | Talk 03:48, September 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, agree with all of the above. --Kevin 13:32, September 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per UnlimitedAccess. --Ajshm 08:32, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Possibly encyclopedic if rewritten under the guise of "notable developments in the MMORPG genre", but that would require extensive sourcing where this has none. --Kyle Davis 04:45, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.