Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Design frontierism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 04:47, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Design frontierism

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Reason: Neologism of insufficient widespread use and original research. Self-promotion: article author is also the author of the dissertation that is supposed to have first introduced the term. § FreeRangeFrog croak 17:08, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete for all the reasons Frog gave. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:09, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research, promotion of article author's neologism. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:43, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete can't find evidence of widespread usage. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 07:11, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 15 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, patent nonsense: Today, companies invest great effort and money in developing new and innovative design solutions on products and services as design being one of the most effective and powerful means to gain competitive edge in the market. As new and different design solutions appear in the market it is forcing other competitor companies to go even further in design solutions thus constantly generating new frontier in the market of fierce design competition. MEGO. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 18:28, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. It's not really nonsense, it's merely puffery. Bearian (talk) 16:35, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
 * A note fronm the creator of this page: Keep - "Design Frontierism is a valid term. The term Design stands for creative problem solving, while Frontierism stands for attitude towards aggressive strategy. The combination of two words warrants what the author is saying as the definition of the term." On his behalf, Bearian (talk) 16:45, 19 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - A neologism that has not received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:37, 20 March 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.