Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Design to Renourish: Sustainable Graphic Design in Practice


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:26, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Design to Renourish: Sustainable Graphic Design in Practice

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced article on a non-notable book. Article created by one of the authors, who contested the prod without explanation or improvement. Author also created an autobio article. -- Finngall  talk  23:29, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of independent, non-trivial coverage that I can see, seems to fail WP:BK - Ba se me nt 12  (T.C) 22:17, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. A completely promotional article. The article has no sources that support notability. The book isn't even published yet. It's due out in December 2016. --Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 09:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Kyle1278 (talk) 11:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as too soon, nothing likely to convince the necessary independent notability, certainly the listed sources are not enough to support this article by itself. SwisterTwister   talk  04:47, 1 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.