Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desire (Grey's Anatomy)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Grey's Anatomy (season 3). Black Kite (talk) 23:30, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Desire (Grey&
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Same problems as Articles for deletion/Let the Angels Commit:"Tagged as failing WP:GNG. Does not seem notable outside of being an episode of Grey's Anatomy."Curb Chain (talk) 01:10, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication of wp:notability of/for a separate episode like this. Zero references.  Looks like part of mass-production of articles on individual episodes with some material duplicated across articles. North8000 (talk) 03:53, 1 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete The Synopsis is a direct CV from http://www.yango.tv/greys-anatomy/season/3. The rest of it may be OR, or copied, who knows, no sources are listed. Not notable. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:51, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 1 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect to Grey's Anatomy (season 3). bd2412  T 21:31, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Nominating this many articles at once makes it almost impossible to find proper sources in the necessary time: it takes 1 minute to do a cookie-cutter nomination, hours of research to source an article. It even takes a while to write a proper response to each AfD; it requires at least reading the article, unlike the explicitly identical AfD nomination. I consider these nomination therefore to disruptively   frustrate the twin goals of deletion policy, which is to rescue what can be rescued and delete only the unrescuable--of which  we have enough. . DGG ( talk ) 19:15, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep and condense the plot section . Unlike most of the other articles nominated, the plot section is more than long enough, but it is not encyclopedic: various incidents are mentioned, but we are not told what becomes of them. It is not easy to write the summary of an incident like this, where most of the matters are left unresolved A sharp reduction into a list would make it even less coherent. What it needs is a more careful approach to what is significant detail.   The source for the plot is as it should be the episode itself. The source for the production data is presumably the DVD jacket, but does need to be stated. Has the nominator or anyone looked for reviews or coverage of the episode in appropriate on and off-line sources? The criterion is unsourceable, not currently unsourced.
 * The article is pretty much fancruft. The bulk of the article is the plot of the episode.  I see no notability from this episode.  Do you?Curb Chain (talk) 05:29, 5 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete or redirect to Grey's Anatomy (season 3). I do not see any significant coverage of this. --He to Hecuba (talk) 16:24, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 13:05, 9 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: Numerous Grey's Anatomy episodes have been serially nominated. More general discussion can be found at Articles for deletion/If Tomorrow Never Comes (Grey's Anatomy).--Milowent • hasspoken  14:06, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep or redirect to season article. With all the serial noms, I do not have time to check each one for notability.  But even any that are not notable should be redirected to the season article per WP:TVEP. Rlendog (talk) 21:26, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * There is some additional coverage here. Rlendog (talk) 02:45, 18 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Grey's Anatomy (season 3). Nothing about this particular episode is individually notable.  See also my comments at Articles for deletion/If Tomorrow Never Comes (Grey's Anatomy).   Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 23:11, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.