Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desire lines


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep. Proto   ||    type    09:44, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Desire lines
This has been transwikied per talk page and is unlikely to develop further from its current state of semi-expanded dic def. &mdash;WAvegetarian&bull;(talk) 20:45, 5 June 2006 (UTC)...so merge as below&mdash;WAvegetarian&bull;(talk) 17:34, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, I think there is some room for expansion, such as engineering to avoid desire lines and the damage that they can cause - killing of plants, increased erosion. Also, there is a lot of stuff on Google about them. -- Kjkolb 21:00, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * please feel free to add to the description, i was hoping other people would add/modify the description. maybe its not right as it is now but i think 'desire lines' belong in wikipedia --Pdxstreetcar
 * Weak keep, can't help but feel it should be redirected to it's 'technical' name, though. -- 9 cds(talk) 23:40, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * keep - needs work but the topic is important in transportation planning. dml 01:47, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * sorry i'm relatively new to editing wiki articles and havent had one challenged before so i apologize for my replies without the proper wiki language and text. 9cds: what is the technical name?--Pdxstreetcar 02:12, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Desire lines is the technical name in transportation. I don't know what 9cds is refering to. dml 19:32, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, my apologies, I thought this was just a slang name as such. I stick by my keep, though. -- 9  cds (talk) 19:35, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: I understand its importance, but I think that the points brought up by Kjkolb and dml would suggest that it would better be covered as a subsection of Transportation planning with a merge and redirect.&mdash;WAvegetarian&bull;(talk) 17:34, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep; there's definitely enough here for a short article. Making it a subsection of transportation planning smacks of subpages, which are strongly deprecated. --Smack (talk) 15:37, 8 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.