Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desjardins' point


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted by RHaworth as a copyvio — Preceding unsigned comment added by Happysquirrel (talk • contribs) 02:28, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Desjardins' point

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to be notable in the English language. In fact I can't find any English-language sources at all to support this point existing. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:10, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment First of all, I found the one sentence in the article to be a copyvio and have tagged it as such. On the topic of notability, note that although English sources are preferable, sources in any language are acceptable. At least in biology, there is no such thing as "notability in English", only notability. Happy Squirrel (talk) 20:00, 28 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.