Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DeskAway


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 18:26, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

DeskAway

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested proposed deletion. Non-notable web content, offering a commercial service. Promotial in tone, claiming to use "advanced" code. References offered are to online trade publications with limited readership and circulation, of a sort that don't really confer notability. Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 18:08, 18 November 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 03:18, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.
 * Delete WP:Advertising --Cleave and Smite, Delete and Tear! (talk) 19:16, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - I'm not sure that the references don't confer notability - the coverage there appears to be fairly significant. However, I admit I'm unsure what counts as a reliable source in this area. Robofish (talk) 21:54, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete notability uncertain, very very spammy. Not quite G11 bad, but quite bad. Not to the benefit of wikipedia to keep. Ray  Talk 19:51, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.