Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deskarga Etilika


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Black Kite (talk) 20:48, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Deskarga Etilika

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable band. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 12:14, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Portuguese underground band. I think they are not notable for Wikipedia. The article is very poorly sourced to one of the members' Myspace page and a page which lists obscure punk/metal bands, this one included. I have never heard about them but I decided to look them up. As always, I found nothing of notability or reliability, just the usual, unreliable stuff like Last.fm, Bandcamp, Discogs, Facebook, Spirit of Metal and Rate Your Music. Aside from these sites, the rest are retail sites, blog sites and name checks. This is a very underground band which did not attract any attention from notable media and they eventually split up in 2008. Another underground band who has no reason to be included in Wikipedia. This article also managed to stay here since 2011. The band has no article on the Portuguese Wikipedia. Databases, social media pages and retail sites do not cut it when we are talking about reliable sources. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 12:11, 16 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 12:14, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 12:14, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amkgp  💬  14:26, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Logs:,  ,  ,


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.