Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desktop Destroyer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Cirt (talk) 02:05, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Desktop Destroyer

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No reason for notability of this application given. Google gives ~470 hits but some are about a different program, and practically all the others are just links to various download sites. I don't see any substantial secondary coverage. Black Kite 23:08, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep: Can confirm that it was well known a few years back. On par with Icy Tower. Ottre (talk) 23:49, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 *  Weak Strong Keep this program was quite popular a few years ago, so is probably notable enough.--UltraMagnus (talk) 00:03, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, but improve and source. Some quick google-news searching turns up this mention in a Dutch newspaper from 2003. --Delirium (talk) 00:10, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete software comes and goes - let it die WikiScrubber (talk) 09:00, 3 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:42, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep I feel that software known to a lot of more people can be considered notable without coverage from media sources. However, sources are of course necessary for all articles and some proof of notability will eventually be needed. It should be kept for the time being, as editors are clearly quite aware of the program and there is no deadline. - Jimmi Hugh (talk) 19:38, 5 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak keep - source above establishes notability; it was well-known a few years ago. Bart133 t c @ How's my driving? 01:47, 6 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.