Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desktop Linux Summit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:44, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Desktop Linux Summit

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I can find no independent coverage of this rather short-lived (2003-2006) technical conference, other than this short article from the now-defunct DesktopLinux.com, which seems to have been run by eWeek. That counts for something, but I don't think it's enough to indicate notability. Yaron K. (talk) 15:00, 31 August 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 16:50, 7 September 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:46, 14 September 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:40, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and California. Shellwood (talk) 15:24, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete First, this has been a stub since at least 2009. Second, I can find some sources from the time and they are mainly about in-fighting among Linux vendors over the nature of the conference. While that itself may be of interest to some, it doesn't appear to me to be significant enough for an article. The conference itself seems to have petered out on its own. Lamona (talk) 22:21, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. Non-notable conference. I'd guess that a not insignificant amount of online coverage is from small websites that are now defunct and can't be found anymore. SWinxy (talk) 19:48, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. It was covered in some depth by Linux Weekly News at the time, as they do for many conferences, but having had a look through their reports there wasn't anything remarkable about it. Adam Sampson (talk) 21:47, 23 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.