Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desmond Scott


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:33, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Desmond Scott

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. One of a glut of articles on seemingly non notable St Peter's College old boys. Wikipedia is not a webhost for a collection bios of a schools former students. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:34, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 December 6.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 07:30, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 11:08, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 11:08, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 11:08, 6 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete It's a common name so not easy to do a comprehensive search for sources, but I can't find references, and the article doesn't provide information of notability (the article author is normally very good at finding references). Tru Test, of which he was MD for 2 or 3 years, may be more notable since it's apparently won a NZ business award and has some press. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:17, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. Only possibility would be New Zealand's Who's Who of 12 years ago. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:30, 6 December 2013 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.