Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desportivo Estância Baixo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per consensus that notability was reached at one point and as notability is lasting, addition of sources is sufficient for a Keep. With thanks to any editor who participates in the needed rework (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 21:51, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Desportivo Estância Baixo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable local football club per WP:FOOTYN. Apparently it only played at national level once. Markussep Talk 06:03, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:32, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:32, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:33, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:14, 25 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Club played in the national top division for a season. Nominator's rationale re FOOTYN is incorrect because of this. Number   5  7  12:44, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I guess you're right, according to this ref they actually played in the 2005 national championship. If the article is kept, it will need a major rewrite, because User:Pumpie and his sockpuppet User:Terriffic Dunker Guy made a mess of it. Markussep Talk 17:57, 26 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:FOOTYN. I have quickly added two sources - more are available. SportingFlyer  talk  11:58, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:FOOTYN. Through a rewrite is needed.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:13, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep as above - needs improving, not deleting. GiantSnowman 11:07, 28 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.