Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desta Global


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Not relisting a third time given low participation rate. Daniel (talk) 03:00, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Desta Global

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Lacks independent coverage. Loaded with Press Releases. Fails WP:NCORP. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:33, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:33, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:33, 23 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Related discussions:

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  01:04, 2 May 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. There are thirty-five sources; surely a lot of them look like crap, but I haven't seen anyone put forth the effort to go through them and assess whether they constitute significant coverage. I'm not seeing why they should be dismissed out of hand as "press releases". jp×g 07:37, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:05, 12 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.