Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Destination Ontario


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ __EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Tourism in Ontario. ✗ plicit  05:13, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Destination Ontario

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

From what I can see, this article does not meet WP:NCORP. Clovermoss 🍀 (talk) 23:14, 14 April 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 23:42, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Business,  and Canada.  Clovermoss 🍀  (talk) 23:14, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge It's not a corporation, it's a government marketing entity. Merge to the Ministry. Oaktree b (talk) 23:17, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm aware it's a government marketing entitity, but I still don't think it meets the notability standards at WP:NCORP. I'm not sure what we could merge, exactly? Most of the article content is a mission statement and in-text external links to their wesbites. An alternative option is a redirect to Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries (Ontario) or Destination Canada but the latter article has similar issues to this one. Clovermoss 🍀  (talk) 23:27, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are lots of references here and elsewhere. It really is a corporation, what the British would call a quango. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:22, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I saw those earlier in my WP:BEFORE. None of these are sources that would qualify for WP:NCORP. Clovermoss 🍀  (talk) 23:31, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete No sign of Notability beyond being a government marketing entity. The mention on Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries (Ontario) is sufficient. Random person no 362478479 (talk) 00:14, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to Tourism in Ontario where there is an unsourced paragraph. I boldly cleaned up this article of the unsourced and promo material, I believe what remains could be merged in the place of the unsource paragraph in the target article. If a consensus forms for another target, I will support it.  // Timothy :: talk  14:07, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Merge to Tourism in Ontario, the edits made work for me.  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 03:32, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to Tourism in Ontario. The person who loves reading (talk) 01:41, 23 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.